We have decided to continue providing and supporting DepthOfCoverage and DiagnoseTargets for the foreseeable future. Going forward, we'll try to integrate them and develop their features to address the main needs of the community. To this end we welcome your continuing feedback, so please feel free to contribute comments and ideas in this thread.

To all who took the time to tell us what you find useful about DoC and DT (and what you wish it could do), a big thank you! This is always very useful to us because it helps us identify which features are most valuable to our users.


mengyuankan


Thanks Geraldine. A newbie question: what's the difference between DepthOfCoverage and DiagnoseTargets, and which one do you recommend to use (or both)?

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


The two are somewhat convergent, but basically DepthOfCoverage allows you to evaluate the depth of coverage in your data at certain sites or over intervals generally, whereas DiagnoseTargets is more specifically designed to evaluate the quality of data covering exome target intervals. The best thing to do is to read their respective documentations pages (links below) and see which sounds like it will suit you needs best. http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/gatkdocs/org_broadinstitute_sting_gatk_walkers_coverage_DepthOfCoverage.html http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/gatkdocs/org_broadinstitute_sting_gatk_walkers_diagnostics_targets_DiagnoseTargets.html

Tue 12 Mar 2013

kevyin


Hi @Geraldine_VdAuwera and thanks for support on this. The DepthOfCoverage documentation mentions -nt as a parallelism option but I get an error. `##### ERROR MESSAGE: Invalid command line: Argument nt has a bad value: The analysis DepthOfCoverage aggregates results by interval. Due to a current limitation of the GATK, analyses of this type do not currently support parallel execution. Please run your analysis without the -nt option.` My command line: `java -jar GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T DepthOfCoverage -I ExampleBAM.bam -R exampleFASTA.fasta -o ./test_coverage_out -nt 4` Is this an error in the documentation? Or am I missing something? Thanks.

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


Hi @kevyin, DOC is currently set up to aggregate statistics over intervals by default, which is incompatible with the `-nt` mode. You can disable this behavior by using the `--omitIntervalStatistics` flag, which should make `-nt` work. Let me know if you have any issues with that. We may change the default behavior in future; in any case we will add a note about this to the documentation. Thanks for reporting this!

Tue 12 Mar 2013

SerenaRhie


Hello, I want the concise depth of coverage summary as well as the per-location covering number of bases for my RNA-Seq data. With not splitting the N containing reads, what does DoC exactly do with -U ALLOW_N_CIGAR_READS option? Is it still counting the bases in the CIGAR array represented as matched? I think the bases represented as N in CIGAR should not be counted, just as the deletions (D) are treated. (Maybe an option such as --includeNBases might be appropriate for special cases.) A good explanation will be helpful to decide the DoC or not. And please do something with the last line of the ERROR MESSAGE "Notice however that if you were to choose the latter, an unspecified subset of the analytical outputs of an unspecified subset of the tools will become unpredictable.", which I think is totally nonsense! :smile:

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


@SerenaRhie, Hah, I think the developer who wrote that error message was feeling particularly sarcastic that day. I'll see what we can do to make that a little more informative. Regarding the behavior question, I believe the Ns in the CIGAR are correctly interpreted as not contributing any coverage. That said, you could run DoC after running the SplitNTrim step, which will give you effective depth after processing.

Tue 12 Mar 2013

SerenaRhie


@Geraldine_VdAuwera Thanks!

Tue 12 Mar 2013

MUHAMMADSOHAILRAZA


Hi @Geraldine_VdAuwera i try to use -nt option while running DoC tool. I added -omitIntervalStatistics. But it still prompts an error. My command was: java -Xmx15g -jar /softwares/GTK/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T DepthOfCoverage \ -log DepthofCov/depth.log -nt 15 -omitIntervalStatistics \ -R /Ref/human_g1k_v37.fasta \ -I /DepthofCov/CHG000691_2_3bam.list \ -geneList /Ref/humanRefseqROD_Final.refseq \ -o /DepthofCov/HM_trios_Samples Error Message: ##### ERROR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ##### ERROR A USER ERROR has occurred (version 3.3-0-g37228af): ##### ERROR ##### ERROR This means that one or more arguments or inputs in your command are incorrect. ##### ERROR The error message below tells you what is the problem. ##### ERROR ##### ERROR If the problem is an invalid argument, please check the online documentation guide ##### ERROR (or rerun your command with --help) to view allowable command-line arguments for this tool. ##### ERROR ##### ERROR Visit our website and forum for extensive documentation and answers to ##### ERROR commonly asked questions http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk ##### ERROR ##### ERROR Please do NOT post this error to the GATK forum unless you have really tried to fix it yourself. ##### ERROR ##### ERROR MESSAGE: Argument with name 'omitIntervalStatistics' isn't defined. ##### ERROR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Can you help me how to resolve this issue? Thanks..

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


Try using two dashes instead of one (--).

Tue 12 Mar 2013




At a glance



Follow us on Twitter

GATK Dev Team

@gatk_dev

@MattBashton Fixed, thanks for reporting!
22 Aug 16
@lexnederbragt Heh, thanks! Credit to @dgmacarthur et al. for driving the sharing train. Been a pleasure and a privilege to be part of it.
18 Aug 16
@lexnederbragt Yeah, we were a bit busy helping with a little project called ExAC... ;-)
18 Aug 16

Our favorite tweets from others

it's the nightly build owl for GATK :D https://t.co/OwTRrk6KHA https://t.co/rfmAbdIIQp
11 Aug 16
We're going to make an hg38 version of ExAC. And we'll make @dgmacarthur pay for it. #BioinformaticsCampaignPromises
2 Aug 16
You’re right @gatk_dev honesty is key! About variants manual filtering: “In any case you're probably in for a world of pain.” Ha now I know!
11 Jul 16
.@gatk_dev I like the new documentation index page, the subheading has made my day! :D #doge #GeekHumourFTW https://t.co/9RXnDTMoBm
8 Jul 16
There is no NGS, NG is today so should only be called high-throughput sequencing #CSC #GATKworkshop https://t.co/paHcNimD7o
16 Jun 16
See more of our favorite tweets...
Search blog by tag

ad appistry ashg benchmarks best-practices bug bug-fixed cancer catvariants challenge cloud cluster commandline commandlinegatk community competition compute conferences cram cromwell denovo depthofcoverage diagnosetargets error fix forum gatk3 genotype genotype-refinement genotypegvcfs google grch38 gvcf haploid haplotypecaller hg38 holiday hts htsjdk ibm java8 job job-offer jobs joint-discovery license meetings mendelianviolations multisample multithreading mutect mutect2 ngs nt outreach pairhmm parallelism patch performance phone-home picard pipeline plans ploidy polyploid poster presentations printreads profile promote reference-model release release-notes rnaseq runtime saas script search selectvariants sequencing service slides snow speed status sting support syntax talks team terminology third-party-tools topstory trivia troll tutorial unifiedgenotyper variantannotator variantrecalibrator vcf-gz version-highlights versions vqsr wdl webinar workflow workshop