We have decided to continue providing and supporting DepthOfCoverage and DiagnoseTargets for the foreseeable future. Going forward, we'll try to integrate them and develop their features to address the main needs of the community. To this end we welcome your continuing feedback, so please feel free to contribute comments and ideas in this thread.

To all who took the time to tell us what you find useful about DoC and DT (and what you wish it could do), a big thank you! This is always very useful to us because it helps us identify which features are most valuable to our users.


mengyuankan


Thanks Geraldine. A newbie question: what's the difference between DepthOfCoverage and DiagnoseTargets, and which one do you recommend to use (or both)?

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


The two are somewhat convergent, but basically DepthOfCoverage allows you to evaluate the depth of coverage in your data at certain sites or over intervals generally, whereas DiagnoseTargets is more specifically designed to evaluate the quality of data covering exome target intervals. The best thing to do is to read their respective documentations pages (links below) and see which sounds like it will suit you needs best. http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/gatkdocs/org_broadinstitute_sting_gatk_walkers_coverage_DepthOfCoverage.html http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/gatkdocs/org_broadinstitute_sting_gatk_walkers_diagnostics_targets_DiagnoseTargets.html

Tue 12 Mar 2013

kevyin


Hi @Geraldine_VdAuwera and thanks for support on this. The DepthOfCoverage documentation mentions -nt as a parallelism option but I get an error. `##### ERROR MESSAGE: Invalid command line: Argument nt has a bad value: The analysis DepthOfCoverage aggregates results by interval. Due to a current limitation of the GATK, analyses of this type do not currently support parallel execution. Please run your analysis without the -nt option.` My command line: `java -jar GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T DepthOfCoverage -I ExampleBAM.bam -R exampleFASTA.fasta -o ./test_coverage_out -nt 4` Is this an error in the documentation? Or am I missing something? Thanks.

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


Hi @kevyin, DOC is currently set up to aggregate statistics over intervals by default, which is incompatible with the `-nt` mode. You can disable this behavior by using the `--omitIntervalStatistics` flag, which should make `-nt` work. Let me know if you have any issues with that. We may change the default behavior in future; in any case we will add a note about this to the documentation. Thanks for reporting this!

Tue 12 Mar 2013

SerenaRhie


Hello, I want the concise depth of coverage summary as well as the per-location covering number of bases for my RNA-Seq data. With not splitting the N containing reads, what does DoC exactly do with -U ALLOW_N_CIGAR_READS option? Is it still counting the bases in the CIGAR array represented as matched? I think the bases represented as N in CIGAR should not be counted, just as the deletions (D) are treated. (Maybe an option such as --includeNBases might be appropriate for special cases.) A good explanation will be helpful to decide the DoC or not. And please do something with the last line of the ERROR MESSAGE "Notice however that if you were to choose the latter, an unspecified subset of the analytical outputs of an unspecified subset of the tools will become unpredictable.", which I think is totally nonsense! :smile:

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


@SerenaRhie, Hah, I think the developer who wrote that error message was feeling particularly sarcastic that day. I'll see what we can do to make that a little more informative. Regarding the behavior question, I believe the Ns in the CIGAR are correctly interpreted as not contributing any coverage. That said, you could run DoC after running the SplitNTrim step, which will give you effective depth after processing.

Tue 12 Mar 2013

SerenaRhie


@Geraldine_VdAuwera Thanks!

Tue 12 Mar 2013

MUHAMMADSOHAILRAZA


Hi @Geraldine_VdAuwera i try to use -nt option while running DoC tool. I added -omitIntervalStatistics. But it still prompts an error. My command was: java -Xmx15g -jar /softwares/GTK/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T DepthOfCoverage \ -log DepthofCov/depth.log -nt 15 -omitIntervalStatistics \ -R /Ref/human_g1k_v37.fasta \ -I /DepthofCov/CHG000691_2_3bam.list \ -geneList /Ref/humanRefseqROD_Final.refseq \ -o /DepthofCov/HM_trios_Samples Error Message: ##### ERROR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ##### ERROR A USER ERROR has occurred (version 3.3-0-g37228af): ##### ERROR ##### ERROR This means that one or more arguments or inputs in your command are incorrect. ##### ERROR The error message below tells you what is the problem. ##### ERROR ##### ERROR If the problem is an invalid argument, please check the online documentation guide ##### ERROR (or rerun your command with --help) to view allowable command-line arguments for this tool. ##### ERROR ##### ERROR Visit our website and forum for extensive documentation and answers to ##### ERROR commonly asked questions http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk ##### ERROR ##### ERROR Please do NOT post this error to the GATK forum unless you have really tried to fix it yourself. ##### ERROR ##### ERROR MESSAGE: Argument with name 'omitIntervalStatistics' isn't defined. ##### ERROR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Can you help me how to resolve this issue? Thanks..

Tue 12 Mar 2013

Geraldine_VdAuwera


Try using two dashes instead of one (--).

Tue 12 Mar 2013




- Recent posts


- Upcoming events

See Events calendar for full list and dates


- Recent events

See Events calendar for full list and dates



- Follow us on Twitter

GATK Dev Team

@gatk_dev

It's official: GATK 4.0 will be released Jan 9, 2018 https://t.co/e76tduFJKk
16 Oct 17
GATK events and workshops update https://t.co/cnn39FPBzY
13 Oct 17
RT @BroadGenomics: Join our @WDL_dev & @gatk_dev teams to learn more on reproducible workflows! #ASHG17 https://t.co/qt6nypKSLc
13 Oct 17
We're excited to be part of this evening workshop demoing the GATK4 WDL pipelines! https://t.co/ScyNqIvmsl
6 Oct 17
I added a video to a @YouTube playlist https://t.co/JhzxN3INZ9 MPG Primer: High throughput sequencing and variant calling pipelines
6 Oct 17

- Our favorite tweets from others

Although it made me cry sometimes, I owe them a lot and love them much more. https://t.co/vUj0cBllgn
16 Oct 17
Round of applause at #BOSC2017 for GATK4 being open sourced. https://t.co/WRhTeKtKTX
23 Jul 17
Round of applause for @Katewanders - Broad Institute will open source data science tools from now on https://t.co/CvLhwgBQUK #BOSC2017
23 Jul 17
The @gatk_dev team, that delivered an excellent "GATK Best Practices for Variant Discovery" workshop this week, on… https://t.co/Z8GNduuDeJ
20 Jul 17
Amazing session @edgenome with @gatk_dev comes to an end. Enriched learning! Thx #gatk #gatk2017 #Genomics #Edinburgh #Bioinformatics
19 Jul 17
See more of our favorite tweets...